CodingActive
Trust Score:
95

FrontierCode

Private maintainer-authored repository tasks graded for mergeability: correctness, tests, scope discipline, style, and code quality.

Launched: Refresh: static
Status Assessment (active):

FrontierCode 1.1 remains difficult and newly launched; Cognition's official results show substantial headroom on the current Main and Extended sets.

Performance Timeline

Longitudinal progression of model scores against human baselines.

Performance & Historical Trajectory

Empirical score progression across model release dates and evaluation rounds.

Independent Vendor-Reported Human Baseline (45.0%)
ModelScoreDateSource TypeProvenance
SWE-1.6 (FrontierCode 1.1 Main pass rate)9.4%2024-06-01vendor-reportedSource ↗
Kimi K2.7 Code (FrontierCode 1.1 Main pass rate)30.1%2024-06-01independentSource ↗
SWE-1.7 (FrontierCode 1.1 Main pass rate)42.3%2024-06-01vendor-reportedSource ↗
GPT-5.5 (FrontierCode 1.1 Main pass rate)43%2024-06-01independentSource ↗
Claude Opus 4.8 (FrontierCode 1.1 Main pass rate)46.5%2024-06-01independentSource ↗

Human Baseline & Difficulty Horizon

Calibrated human reference points, specialist benchmarks, and ceiling thresholds.
Measured Human Score45.0%Domain Expert Baseline
Baseline Protocol & Interpretation

Senior software engineer completion rate on repository-scale frontier programming challenges.

Metric & Scoring Methodology

Verification protocols, aggregation formulas, and specialized metric variants.
Primary Metric:pass rate on FrontierCode 1.1 Main (%)
Scoring Engine:composite

Dataset & Compute Cost

Evaluation volume, public availability, API pricing, and local hardware requirements.
Total Dataset Size150Annotated evaluation items
Public Test SetPublicOpenly mirrored on repositories
Access GatingOpen AccessUnrestricted download
Evaluation LicenseOpen AccessDataset usage and redistribution terms
Frontier API Compute Cost:

$5 – $20 USD for full benchmark evaluation run on frontier APIs.

Recommended Local GPU Setup:

1x NVIDIA RTX 4090 (24GB) or A100 (40GB/80GB) via vLLM / SGLang

Official Dataset & Benchmark Files:Download / View Dataset Repository ↗

How to Run & Reproduce

Standardized evaluation protocols, CLI commands, and reproducible runner templates.
Prompt Regimezero-shot
Reasoning Modedirect
Sampling Temp0
Pass@k Budgetk = 1
Tools & SandboxPure Text
Scoring Verifiercomposite
Option AEleutherAI LM-Evaluation-Harness (Open-Weight Models)
lm_eval --model hf --model_args pretrained=<model_path> --tasks frontiercode --batch_size auto
Option BOpenCompass Evaluation Framework
opencompass --datasets frontiercode --models <model_config>
Python APIDeterministic Inference Loop Snippet
# Standard API Evaluation Loop
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
    temperature=0.0,
)
Standardized Reporting Requirement:

When publishing results for FrontierCode, always report the exact prompt template, few-shot exemplar ordering, sampling temperature (temperature=0), maximum reasoning budget tokens, and the precise timestamped model snapshot ID.

Contamination & Memorization Analysis

Audit of pretraining exposure risks, memorization vectors, and refresh policies.
Overall Contamination Risk:LOW
Refresh Cadence:

Static fixed snapshot

Test Set Exposure:

Public on web / HuggingFace