KnowledgeActive
Trust Score:
90

SimpleQA

4,326 short fact-seeking questions chosen to stump GPT-4 — a hallucination test graded correct / incorrect / not-attempted.

Launched: Refresh: static
Status Assessment (active):

Still discriminating hard. Frontier models remain well short of the ceiling on parametric recall: GPT-4o 38% correct at launch, GPT-4.5 ~62% by early 2025 — climbing but nowhere near solved, and reasoning-tuned models do not automatically help (o1-mini scored 8%). What would move it off 'active': frontier 'correct' crossing ~85–90% (approaching the label ceiling), OR retrieval-augmented deployment becoming universal enough that closed-book parametric recall stops mattering. Neither has happened.

Performance Timeline

Longitudinal progression of model scores against human baselines.

Performance & Historical Trajectory

Empirical score progression across model release dates and evaluation rounds.

Independent Vendor-Reported Human Baseline (94.4%)
ModelScoreDateSource TypeProvenance
GPT-4.562.5%2025-02-27vendor-reportedSource ↗
Claude 3 Opus23.5%2024-11-07independentSource ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet28.9%2024-11-07independentSource ↗
GPT-4o38.2%2024-11-07vendor-reportedSource ↗
o1-preview42.7%2024-11-07vendor-reportedSource ↗

Human Baseline & Difficulty Horizon

Calibrated human reference points, specialist benchmarks, and ceiling thresholds.
Measured Human Score94.4%Domain Expert Baseline
Baseline Protocol & Interpretation

Consensus agreement rate among independent third-party human fact-checkers on 4,326 factual queries.

Metric & Scoring Methodology

Verification protocols, aggregation formulas, and specialized metric variants.
Primary Metric:correct (accuracy over all questions, %)
Scoring Engine:llm-judge

Dataset & Compute Cost

Evaluation volume, public availability, API pricing, and local hardware requirements.
Total Dataset Size4,326Annotated evaluation items
Public Test SetPublicOpenly mirrored on repositories
Access GatingOpen AccessUnrestricted download
Evaluation LicenseOpen AccessDataset usage and redistribution terms
Frontier API Compute Cost:

$5 – $20 USD for full benchmark evaluation run on frontier APIs.

Recommended Local GPU Setup:

1x NVIDIA RTX 4090 (24GB) or A100 (40GB/80GB) via vLLM / SGLang

Official Dataset & Benchmark Files:Download / View Dataset Repository ↗

How to Run & Reproduce

Standardized evaluation protocols, CLI commands, and reproducible runner templates.
Prompt Regimezero-shot
Reasoning Modedirect
Sampling Temp0
Pass@k Budgetk = 1
Tools & SandboxPure Text
Scoring Verifierllm-judge
Option AEleutherAI LM-Evaluation-Harness (Open-Weight Models)
lm_eval --model hf --model_args pretrained=<model_path> --tasks simpleqa --batch_size auto
Option BOpenCompass Evaluation Framework
opencompass --datasets simpleqa --models <model_config>
Python APIDeterministic Inference Loop Snippet
# Standard API Evaluation Loop
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
    temperature=0.0,
)
Standardized Reporting Requirement:

When publishing results for SimpleQA, always report the exact prompt template, few-shot exemplar ordering, sampling temperature (temperature=0), maximum reasoning budget tokens, and the precise timestamped model snapshot ID.

Contamination & Memorization Analysis

Audit of pretraining exposure risks, memorization vectors, and refresh policies.
Overall Contamination Risk:MEDIUM
Refresh Cadence:

Static fixed snapshot

Test Set Exposure:

Public on web / HuggingFace