ReasoningSaturated
Trust Score:
25

HellaSwag

Choose the plausible continuation of an everyday event from one real ending and three adversarially filtered machine generations.

Launched: Refresh: static
Status Assessment (saturated):

GPT-4 base reached 95.3% on a private holdout against the original 95.6% human reference; the official leaderboard closed submissions in 2024, and public validation data is contamination-prone.

Performance Timeline

Longitudinal progression of model scores against human baselines.

Performance & Historical Trajectory

Empirical score progression across model release dates and evaluation rounds.

Independent Vendor-Reported Human Baseline (95.6%)
ModelScoreDateSource TypeProvenance
GPT-4o95.3%2024-08-01vendor-reportedSource ↗
Llama 3 70B88%2024-04-18vendor-reportedSource ↗
Claude 3 Opus95.4%2024-03-04vendor-reportedSource ↗
Gemini Ultra (10-shot decontaminated)87.8%2023-12-06vendor-reportedSource ↗
GPT-4 base (10-shot)95.3%2023-03-14vendor-reportedSource ↗
LLaMA-65B84.2%2023-02-27vendor-reportedSource ↗
PaLM 540B83.4%2022-04-01vendor-reportedSource ↗
GPT-3 175B (few-shot)79.3%2020-07-22vendor-reportedSource ↗
RoBERTa85.2%2019-07-25independentSource ↗
BERT-Large47.3%2019-05-19independentSource ↗

Human Baseline & Difficulty Horizon

Calibrated human reference points, specialist benchmarks, and ceiling thresholds.
Measured Human Score95.6%Domain Expert Baseline
Baseline Protocol & Interpretation

Human accuracy on adversarial sentence completion and commonsense story continuation.

Metric & Scoring Methodology

Verification protocols, aggregation formulas, and specialized metric variants.
Primary Metric:normalized accuracy (%)
Scoring Engine:log-likelihood

Dataset & Compute Cost

Evaluation volume, public availability, API pricing, and local hardware requirements.
Total Dataset Size10,003Annotated evaluation items
Public Test SetPublicOpenly mirrored on repositories
Access GatingOpen AccessUnrestricted download
Evaluation LicenseOpen AccessDataset usage and redistribution terms
Frontier API Compute Cost:

$5 – $20 USD for full benchmark evaluation run on frontier APIs.

Recommended Local GPU Setup:

1x NVIDIA RTX 4090 (24GB) or A100 (40GB/80GB) via vLLM / SGLang

Official Dataset & Benchmark Files:Download / View Dataset Repository ↗

How to Run & Reproduce

Standardized evaluation protocols, CLI commands, and reproducible runner templates.
Prompt Regimezero-shot
Reasoning Modedirect
Sampling Temp0
Pass@k Budgetk = 1
Tools & SandboxPure Text
Scoring Verifierlog-likelihood
Option AEleutherAI LM-Evaluation-Harness (Open-Weight Models)
lm_eval --model hf --model_args pretrained=<model_path> --tasks hellaswag --batch_size auto
Option BOpenCompass Evaluation Framework
opencompass --datasets hellaswag --models <model_config>
Python APIDeterministic Inference Loop Snippet
# Standard API Evaluation Loop
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
    temperature=0.0,
)
Standardized Reporting Requirement:

When publishing results for HellaSwag, always report the exact prompt template, few-shot exemplar ordering, sampling temperature (temperature=0), maximum reasoning budget tokens, and the precise timestamped model snapshot ID.

Contamination & Memorization Analysis

Audit of pretraining exposure risks, memorization vectors, and refresh policies.
Overall Contamination Risk:HIGH
Refresh Cadence:

Static fixed snapshot

Test Set Exposure:

Public on web / HuggingFace