CodingSaturated
Trust Score:
25

HumanEval+

HumanEval's 164 Python tasks re-evaluated with roughly 80 times more tests to expose plausible but incorrect programs.

Launched: Refresh: static
Status Assessment (saturated):

The official EvalPlus leaderboard reports o1-preview and o1-mini at 89.0% HumanEval+ pass@1; with only 164 fully public prompts, remaining score gaps are too small and exposure-prone for a reliable frontier ranking.

Performance Timeline

Longitudinal progression of model scores against human baselines.

Performance & Historical Trajectory

Empirical score progression across model release dates and evaluation rounds.

Independent Vendor-Reported Human Baseline (91.5%)
ModelScoreDateSource TypeProvenance
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct87.2%2024-11-12independentSource ↗
Grok Beta80.5%2024-11-04independentSource ↗
DeepSeek-V3 (November 2024)86.6%2024-11-01independentSource ↗
DeepSeek-V2.5 (November 2024)83.5%2024-11-01independentSource ↗
Gemini 1.5 Pro 00279.3%2024-09-24independentSource ↗
o1-preview (September 2024)89%2024-09-12independentSource ↗
o1-mini (September 2024)89%2024-09-12independentSource ↗
GPT-4o (August 2024)87.2%2024-08-06independentSource ↗
GPT-4o Mini (July 2024)83.5%2024-07-18independentSource ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June 2024)81.7%2024-06-20independentSource ↗
DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct82.3%2024-06-17independentSource ↗
CodeQwen1.5-7B-Chat78.7%2024-04-18independentSource ↗
GPT-4-Turbo (April 2024)86.6%2024-04-09independentSource ↗
GPT-4-Turbo (November 2023)81.7%2023-11-06independentSource ↗
GPT-4 (May 2023)79.3%2023-05-02independentSource ↗

Human Baseline & Difficulty Horizon

Calibrated human reference points, specialist benchmarks, and ceiling thresholds.
Measured Human Score91.5%Domain Expert Baseline
Baseline Protocol & Interpretation

Pass@1 solve rate achieved by human programmers against expanded, rigorous unit test suites.

Metric & Scoring Methodology

Verification protocols, aggregation formulas, and specialized metric variants.
Primary Metric:HumanEval+ pass@1 (%)
Scoring Engine:unit-tests

Dataset & Compute Cost

Evaluation volume, public availability, API pricing, and local hardware requirements.
Total Dataset Size164Annotated evaluation items
Public Test SetPublicOpenly mirrored on repositories
Access GatingOpen AccessUnrestricted download
Evaluation LicenseOpen AccessDataset usage and redistribution terms
Frontier API Compute Cost:

$5 – $20 USD for full benchmark evaluation run on frontier APIs.

Recommended Local GPU Setup:

1x NVIDIA RTX 4090 (24GB) or A100 (40GB/80GB) via vLLM / SGLang

Official Dataset & Benchmark Files:Download / View Dataset Repository ↗

How to Run & Reproduce

Standardized evaluation protocols, CLI commands, and reproducible runner templates.
Prompt Regimezero-shot
Reasoning Modedirect
Sampling Temp0
Pass@k Budgetk = 1
Tools & SandboxPure Text
Scoring Verifierunit-tests
Option AEleutherAI LM-Evaluation-Harness (Open-Weight Models)
lm_eval --model hf --model_args pretrained=<model_path> --tasks humaneval-plus --batch_size auto
Option BOpenCompass Evaluation Framework
opencompass --datasets humaneval-plus --models <model_config>
Python APIDeterministic Inference Loop Snippet
# Standard API Evaluation Loop
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
    temperature=0.0,
)
Standardized Reporting Requirement:

When publishing results for HumanEval+, always report the exact prompt template, few-shot exemplar ordering, sampling temperature (temperature=0), maximum reasoning budget tokens, and the precise timestamped model snapshot ID.

Contamination & Memorization Analysis

Audit of pretraining exposure risks, memorization vectors, and refresh policies.
Overall Contamination Risk:HIGH
Refresh Cadence:

Static fixed snapshot

Test Set Exposure:

Public on web / HuggingFace