CodingSaturated
Trust Score:
25

MBPP

Mostly Basic Programming Problems: 974 crowd-sourced Python synthesis tasks intended for entry-level programmers.

Launched: Refresh: static
Status Assessment (saturated):

CodeSOTA's 2026 MBPP pass@1 registry has multiple frontier and open-code models clustered from 89% to 95%, while the short public tasks and three-test protocol remain too weak for current frontier comparison.

Performance Timeline

Longitudinal progression of model scores against human baselines.

Performance & Historical Trajectory

Empirical score progression across model release dates and evaluation rounds.

Independent Vendor-Reported Human Baseline (88.0%)
ModelScoreDateSource TypeProvenance
o3-mini (CodeSOTA MBPP pass@1)93.3%2025-01-31independentSource ↗
DeepSeek-V3 (CodeSOTA MBPP pass@1)89.3%2024-12-26independentSource ↗
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct (CodeSOTA MBPP pass@1)90.2%2024-11-12independentSource ↗
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B (CodeSOTA MBPP pass@1)90.2%2024-11-12independentSource ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024; CodeSOTA MBPP pass@1)91%2024-10-22independentSource ↗
DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct (CodeSOTA MBPP pass@1)89.4%2024-06-14independentSource ↗
o4-mini (CodeSOTA MBPP pass@1)94.9%2024-06-01independentSource ↗
Claude Opus 4 (CodeSOTA MBPP pass@1)92%2024-06-01independentSource ↗
GPT-4.1 (CodeSOTA MBPP pass@1)90.9%2024-06-01independentSource ↗
Claude Sonnet 4 (CodeSOTA MBPP pass@1)89.6%2024-06-01independentSource ↗

Human Baseline & Difficulty Horizon

Calibrated human reference points, specialist benchmarks, and ceiling thresholds.
Measured Human Score88.0%Domain Expert Baseline
Baseline Protocol & Interpretation

Human software engineer pass@1 solve rate on beginner-to-intermediate Python tasks without execution feedback.

Metric & Scoring Methodology

Verification protocols, aggregation formulas, and specialized metric variants.
Primary Metric:pass@1 on the 500-task test split (%)
Scoring Engine:unit-tests

Dataset & Compute Cost

Evaluation volume, public availability, API pricing, and local hardware requirements.
Total Dataset Size500Annotated evaluation items
Public Test SetPublicOpenly mirrored on repositories
Access GatingOpen AccessUnrestricted download
Evaluation LicenseOpen AccessDataset usage and redistribution terms
Frontier API Compute Cost:

$5 – $20 USD for full benchmark evaluation run on frontier APIs.

Recommended Local GPU Setup:

1x NVIDIA RTX 4090 (24GB) or A100 (40GB/80GB) via vLLM / SGLang

Official Dataset & Benchmark Files:Download / View Dataset Repository ↗

How to Run & Reproduce

Standardized evaluation protocols, CLI commands, and reproducible runner templates.
Prompt Regimezero-shot
Reasoning Modedirect
Sampling Temp0
Pass@k Budgetk = 1
Tools & SandboxPure Text
Scoring Verifierunit-tests
Option AEleutherAI LM-Evaluation-Harness (Open-Weight Models)
lm_eval --model hf --model_args pretrained=<model_path> --tasks mbpp --batch_size auto
Option BOpenCompass Evaluation Framework
opencompass --datasets mbpp --models <model_config>
Python APIDeterministic Inference Loop Snippet
# Standard API Evaluation Loop
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
    temperature=0.0,
)
Standardized Reporting Requirement:

When publishing results for MBPP, always report the exact prompt template, few-shot exemplar ordering, sampling temperature (temperature=0), maximum reasoning budget tokens, and the precise timestamped model snapshot ID.

Contamination & Memorization Analysis

Audit of pretraining exposure risks, memorization vectors, and refresh policies.
Overall Contamination Risk:HIGH
Refresh Cadence:

Static fixed snapshot

Test Set Exposure:

Public on web / HuggingFace