ReasoningSaturated
Trust Score:
25

WinoGrande

Binary fill-in-the-blank commonsense problems, scaled from Winograd schemas and adversarially filtered to reduce dataset shortcuts.

Launched: Refresh: static
Status Assessment (saturated):

The original XL result was 79.1% against a 94.0% human estimate, leaving real headroom, but the static public inputs and widespread validation-set use make modern scores contamination-sensitive.

Performance Timeline

Longitudinal progression of model scores against human baselines.

Performance & Historical Trajectory

Empirical score progression across model release dates and evaluation rounds.

Independent Vendor-Reported Human Baseline (94.0%)
ModelScoreDateSource TypeProvenance
Llama 3.1 405B (5-shot)89.2%2024-07-23vendor-reportedSource ↗
Llama 3 70B (5-shot)83.1%2024-04-18vendor-reportedSource ↗
Claude 3 Opus (5-shot)88.5%2024-03-04vendor-reportedSource ↗
Llama 2 70B (5-shot)81.8%2023-07-18vendor-reportedSource ↗
GPT-4 (5-shot)87.5%2023-03-14vendor-reportedSource ↗
PaLM 540B (5-shot)85.1%2022-04-04vendor-reportedSource ↗
GPT-3 175B (few-shot)77.7%2020-07-22vendor-reportedSource ↗
BERT-Large (fine-tuned)64.9%2019-07-24independentSource ↗
RoBERTa-large (fine-tuned)79.1%2019-07-24independentSource ↗

Human Baseline & Difficulty Horizon

Calibrated human reference points, specialist benchmarks, and ceiling thresholds.
Measured Human Score94.0%Domain Expert Baseline
Baseline Protocol & Interpretation

Human accuracy on pronoun coreference resolution and adversarial commonsense pairs.

Metric & Scoring Methodology

Verification protocols, aggregation formulas, and specialized metric variants.
Primary Metric:accuracy (%)
Scoring Engine:exact-match

Dataset & Compute Cost

Evaluation volume, public availability, API pricing, and local hardware requirements.
Total Dataset Size1,767Annotated evaluation items
Public Test SetPublicOpenly mirrored on repositories
Access GatingOpen AccessUnrestricted download
Evaluation LicenseOpen AccessDataset usage and redistribution terms
Frontier API Compute Cost:

$5 – $20 USD for full benchmark evaluation run on frontier APIs.

Recommended Local GPU Setup:

1x NVIDIA RTX 4090 (24GB) or A100 (40GB/80GB) via vLLM / SGLang

Official Dataset & Benchmark Files:Download / View Dataset Repository ↗

How to Run & Reproduce

Standardized evaluation protocols, CLI commands, and reproducible runner templates.
Prompt Regimezero-shot
Reasoning Modedirect
Sampling Temp0
Pass@k Budgetk = 1
Tools & SandboxPure Text
Scoring Verifierexact-match
Option AEleutherAI LM-Evaluation-Harness (Open-Weight Models)
lm_eval --model hf --model_args pretrained=<model_path> --tasks winogrande --batch_size auto
Option BOpenCompass Evaluation Framework
opencompass --datasets winogrande --models <model_config>
Python APIDeterministic Inference Loop Snippet
# Standard API Evaluation Loop
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
    temperature=0.0,
)
Standardized Reporting Requirement:

When publishing results for WinoGrande, always report the exact prompt template, few-shot exemplar ordering, sampling temperature (temperature=0), maximum reasoning budget tokens, and the precise timestamped model snapshot ID.

Contamination & Memorization Analysis

Audit of pretraining exposure risks, memorization vectors, and refresh policies.
Overall Contamination Risk:HIGH
Refresh Cadence:

Static fixed snapshot

Test Set Exposure:

Public on web / HuggingFace